logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.02 2015고정1823
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 8, 2015, the Defendant stated in the facts charged of the instant case that, at around 02:40 on February 8, 2015, the victim C (Woo, 43 years old) who was the Defendant’s wife at his residence B 203-dong 1905, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, 203, and 1905, he shouldered the Defendant, who was the Defendant’s wife, and asked him to the bath room.

The term “the victim” refers to “the victim was fluord by hand, and the victim was fluored by fluoring the victim’s brush and

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 28, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow