The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that there is no fact that the victim was dead, except for the string of the victim’s arms, and thus, the injury sustained by the victim is not caused by the assault of the defendant.

Rather, while the defendant led the victim to his house and reported to the police, the victim took his face between knee and unhulled, and argued that he was assaulted by the defendant on the same face side even before, but the defendant was acquitted.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that recognized the defendant's injury was erroneous in misconception of facts.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the lower court: ① immediately after the instant case, the victim’s appearance of the photograph taken at the earth was Hungary and face was red; in particular, there was a red hole on both sides of the luminous body; ② the victim’s photograph was taken before the victim started her own injury; ② the victim’s appearance and head was Hungary more seriously, and the upper part of the left luminous body was red; ③ on March 9, 2012, 201, the doctor provided treatment of the victim, “at the time of the instant case, the victim was dried and dried, and the victim was dried, so long as the victim was dried before the victim started her own injury; ③ the doctor provided treatment of the victim, i.e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e., g., g., the left body.