Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, as to the Defendants for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on June 14, 2012, is sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 6 months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Forest) in the Gangwon District Court's Gangwon Branch Branch, and the said judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 22th of the same month and is still

Defendants are engaged in landscaping business and have 30 years of age or more, and have ever come between their friendships.

Defendant

B was aware of the early August 2010, 201, after hearing the statement from E to the police officer, that the F, a E's land, was found to have a person to purchase the trees of the G G land at the time of three times, and the Defendant A directly examined the said forest land with the Defendant, and then, the purchaser of the trees was to black the person to purchase the trees.

On August 2010, the Defendants stated that “The Defendant would pay KRW 3,50,00,00,00,00,000,00,00,00,000,00 to the victim I introduced through Defendant A’s friendship Ha in the Dan-si, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, that “If the Defendant made a large investment of KRW 2,50,000,000,00,00,000,00,000,000,000,00,00

However, in fact, G, J, K, and L did not have the permission to excavate pine trees from the time of scam from the time of scam in accordance with the relevant laws, such as the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, and the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to repay 3.5 million won to the victims by extracting pine trees within three months. Defendant B was well aware that, around September 3, 2010, G and J forests from the public official in charge of scaming with E as a park site are impossible to extract pine trees, and even if the general industrial complex was constructed in the whole area of the above forest land, the remaining forest land is not directly discharged from pine extraction permission. Defendant B transferred such situation to Defendant A, and the Defendants were not legally permitted to extract pine trees from the above forest.

Nevertheless, the Defendants are the defendants.