logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.11.17 2017고단6185
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, for Defendant C, D, and E, for four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual owner of the “L” located in 1st, Nam-gu, Incheon. Defendant B is the manager of the interest for the business in the name of the head of the above game, Defendant C and Defendant D are employees of the above game site (head of the office), and Defendant E is the exchange of the above game site.

From May 22, 2015, the Defendants conspired to establish a total of 90 games in the said “L” (30, Kland 20, 20, 20, 20 per annum, and 20 per annum, from around August 3, 2017 to around August 3, 2017. The Defendants made many and unspecified customers who find the head of the said game play the game by inserting KRW 10,00 per hour, and made them play the game. The accumulated points (bank points) obtained by the customers through the game to enter and manage the PC in the shape of the said game, and, if the customers desire to exchange, they made the accumulated points of the customers to delete the accumulated points of the customers and to make the money exchange in the amount of cash given.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on internal investigation (attached photographs by exchanging dynamics and capturings), investigation report (No. 25 of the evidence analysis), investigation report (No. 23 of the evidence analysis 2);

1. Each protocol of seizure, each list of seizure, and search site photographs (netly 24);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a permit for a general game providing business operator or a photograph of a text camera (29 times a year);

1. Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; Articles 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (defendant B, C, and E);

1. The observation of protection (defendant B, C, and E) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A, C, and E);

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

A. Defendant A [the scope of the recommended punishment] The use of illegal games is provided, etc.

arrow