Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the proprietor of the “E” Gameland located in Busan Sagu.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase intangible results, such as scores obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, within the above game room, the defendant set up a total of 50 games, such as 20 games, 20 games, 20 games, and 10 games for "New Sea", and provided many unspecified customers with the above game, and joined the game as F-based members.

On March 4, 2016, the Defendant, at around 11:29, ordered an employee to transfer KRW 321,300,00 to the said customer in total three times via the above method, by means of: (a) having the said customer accumulate points (electronic currency) purchased in advance in the game, and transfer KRW 89,100 in cash from the said “F to the bank account (new bank, H) of the customer; and (b) having an employee settle the points obtained by the said customer using “F” app.

From March 4, 2016 to June 7, 2016, the Defendant engaged in money exchange business by exchanging points that an unspecified customer acquired as the result of the game in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against I and J (the net time 22);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents (at the end of 4,6-18), a copy of the franchise store contract;

1. Relevant Article of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry, and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is the same as the game of this case and the size of exchange, and the defendant.