The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the defendant misunderstanding the fact that the defendant gets the head of the victim's head, there is no fact that the defendant gets the head of the victim's head by cutting the victim's head, such as the facts charged, beyond the floor.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심과 당 심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 ‘ 피고인이 뒤에서 머리채를 잡아당겨 바닥에 넘어졌고 그 과정에서 머리카락이 한 움큼 빠졌다’ 고 진술한 점, ② 이 사건 발생 당일 수사기관에서 촬영한 피해 사진에 의하면, 피해자의 머리 부분에 발갛게 부어오른 상처와 피해자에게 서 뽑힌 머리카락 뭉치가 확인되는 점, ③ 피고인도 수사기관에서 ‘ 순간적으로 화가 나서 피해자의 뒤로 가서 머리채를 잡아당겨 바닥에 넘어뜨렸다.

In full view of the facts charged in this case at the court below’s court, it is recognized that the Defendant inflicted a bodily injury by putting the victim’s head debt on the floor above the floor as stated in the facts charged.

B. Considering that there are circumstances that may be considered in the circumstances leading to the Defendant’s instant crime, and that there was no criminal record of the same kind, the Defendant did not appear to have a strong attitude of reflection, the Defendant did not make any effort to recover damage and did not agree with the victim, and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, in full view of various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc.

3...