1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months;

2. Provided, That the execution of sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

On March 20, 2017, the Defendant publicly stated the false facts about D by stating that “F and alcoholic beverage are drinking at “E” operated by D, and “low farc year is equal to bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, her husband is playing farcing with cancer, and her husband is sexually sexually sexually with farcing with farc, young male vaga, her husband is not farcing, and her husband is not farcing with high addition.”

Since then, on November 28, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for an honorary injury at the single criminal tribunal of the Ulsan District Court No. 8 of the Ulsan District Court, and the Defendant appealed and dismissed the appeal on February 9, 2018.

The defendant was convicted of having been convicted because F was present as a witness in the trial of the first instance and testified unfavorable to the defendant.

I thought that the F would be subject to criminal punishment, and the F would be able to submit a complaint against F.

On December 29, 2017, the Defendant submitted a false complaint with respect to F to the Ulsan-gun Police Station in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, and Eup located in the sixth-lane in the village of 6-lane.

On October 27, 2017, the complaint states that "F, a defendant, was present as a witness at the court of Ulsan District Court 404, the Ulsan District Court 404 on October 27, 2017, and then the prosecutor stated that "The defendant, at the entrance of the above restaurant, is referred to D, who is a restaurant operator, and the husband, who is suffering from the cancer, and the husband said that he is not a sexual intercourse with other male and female attachment," "I am winded by her husband."

The prosecutor's answer to "the defendant is also the husband of D, and the husband made a false testimony in response to the question of "N's statement that he does not have a sexual intercourse," and the defendant actually made a statement about D and G, and therefore, F made a false testimony. Thus, F made a false testimony.