1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on March 20, 2014 regarding the case shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The title of the invention claimed in this case (No. 2 No. 1): The filing date and the application number of the luminous compensation film, the upper film and the combination 2): the filing date and the application number: September 5, 2007 / the claims (as amended on September 24, 2012) No. 1-9, 11, 13-21, 23-26) / Paragraph 10 of the Claim / The film (hereinafter referred to as “concid 10”) made with the number of Emph Emphs, and the film is not included in the non-permanent film ratio (hereinafter referred to as “concid 2”) with the direction of niver of niver of niver of niver of niver of niver of 207.9.5//2006, and the claim rate (as amended on September 24, 2012) 1-9.

= “The provision of Article 5 = (2)” = “the Enforcement Decree of the Patent Act” = “the Patent Act” = “the provision of Article 5” = “the provision of Article 8” = “the provision of Article 42” = “the provision of Article 42” = “the claims” = “2”. “. 1”. “The provision of Article 2” = 2-9” is unclear, and “the provision of Article 4” = “the provision of Article 2” = 2-9”. “The Plaintiff”. “The provision of Article 5 = 9.0”. “The Plaintiff’s patent application invention” = “the examiner” = “the Commissioner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office” = “the decision of the trial”.

= The term " ="

= 2) and “Attachment 1” [Attachment 2] and “(Attachment 1” = “The scope of “” = “the main =” ? “the public combination” = “A” = “A 10-206-82814”. “. 7 = 7.”. “A 2006.” = “A 8.” b.

= 1] “A” = “A” = “A” = “A” = “A” = “a” = (a)” = “a” = “a” = (a)” = “a 1.1 = (a 50 x (a 550 x x 550 m”)” = “a 550 m” = “a 550 m”” = “a 550 m”. “a 450 m”. “a 450 m”. “a 450 m”. “a m x 450 m”. “a m x 450 nm x 450 nm x 3”. “a”