logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2017나84488
부당이득금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below is revoked, and that part.

Reasons

1. Basic facts of claim: ① The Plaintiff is a person engaged in the secondhand sales business using the trade name of “F.”, the Defendant is the owner of the instant vehicle indicated in the separate sheet, and Nonparty C purchased the instant vehicle under the Defendant’s name, which was the actual owner of the instant vehicle (C around March 2, 2016, as the Defendant’s sales store’s type H). ② around May 2017, C signed an agreement with the Plaintiff on the purchase price of the instant vehicle at KRW 52 million with KRW 00,000,000 with the Defendant’s desire to sell the instant vehicle at KRW 50,000,000,000 to KRW 5,000,000,0000 to KRW 5,000,000,000,000 to KRW 5,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000).

arrow