beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning Appointers K and L shall be revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims against K and L shall be filed.
Reasons
1. Fact that there is no dispute over the facts of recognition [based for recognition], entries in Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including each branch number), and the purport of the whole pleadings;
A. The Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the designated person I, who was the owner of the instant building, with respect to each of the units listed in the items in the table below among the instant buildings, or renewed the lease agreement already entered into with regard to the pertinent units.
[Attachment of each lease agreement entered into with I (hereinafter referred to as "each of the instant lease agreements"). The period of No. 1 A from February 24, 2010 to February 5, 2004: 2 years and B B 604 October 6, 2000 from March 6, 2010 to October 6, 200, 3 C 403 403, 200 from January 15, 201 to 306, 200 from January 28, 200 (rent 20, 205 to 40, 206, 200 from February 6, 201 to 205, 206 to 40, 200 renewed from February 24, 201 to 30, 206, 204 to 18, 201, respectively.
B. Although the lease term expires on August 15, 2010, Plaintiff H failed to refund the lease deposit from the designated party I. On December 17, 2010, Plaintiff H applied for the order of lease registration as Seoul Western District Court 2010Kaga1960 on December 21, 2010 of the above court’s order of lease registration as to 502 of the instant building under the order of lease registration as of December 21, 2010 of the above court’s receipt on December 30, 2010, Plaintiff H delivered 502 of the instant building to the designated party as of December 30, 2010.
C. After that, on August 19, 201, Plaintiff H applied for a compulsory auction on the instant building to Seoul Western District Court M, based on the claim for refund of the deposit for lease deposit, and received a decision to commence compulsory auction from the relevant court on August 22, 2011.
Meanwhile, the rest of the plaintiffs except the plaintiff H is below the procedure for compulsory auction.