A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as an employee from 'DMoel' in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu.

On January 27, 2014, the Defendant received accommodation expenses of 35,000 won from the above Del 306 room on 20:30 on January 27, 2014, and had the juvenile E (the age of 17) and the male F (the age of 30) do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Application of statutes to a copy of a business report;

1. Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment, and subparagraph 5 of Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that there was no intention to allow the defendant to have sexual intercourse in the judgment of the defendant and his/her defense counsel regarding the claim of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

If any circumstance exists to suspect that a person who intends to become a juvenile in the outer appearance, scam, etc. of those who intend to become a sexual intercourse, he/she shall confirm whether he/she is a juvenile by his/her identification card or any other reliable method and allow a sexual intercourse only where it is confirmed that he/she is not a juvenile.

그런데 판시 증거를 종합하면, 피고인은 E에게 신분증을 보여 달라고 하자 그녀가 신분증을 보여주지 않고 계속 전화통화를 하면서 손가락으로 조용히 하라면서 ‘쉭’하고, F은 그녀가 미성년자가 아니라면서 자기가 책임을 진다면서 올라가서 확인해보고 연락을 준다고 하여 피고인이 돈 35,000원을 받고 306호 키를 내준 사실을 인정할 수 있는바, 사정이 이와 같다면 피고인으로서는 E이 F과 함께 여관에 들어가려고 하는 경우 신분증이나 다른 확실한 방법으로 청소년인지 여부를 확인하였어야 하였다.

Therefore, if the defendant did not make such confirmation at all, but only believed the horses of F and allowed the mixed accommodation of E and F, at least juveniles.