Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “C unmanned telecom” in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

No one shall engage in business activities disturbing public morals, such as having male and female juveniles lodge together, or provide a place for such business activities.

Nevertheless, at around 05:00 on November 11, 2018, the Defendant had three male male and two female male and female to have the guest room in the above unmanned telecom D, including E (16 years of age), F (15 years of age), G (n, 15 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Photographss, telecom and unmanned machine photographs of juveniles (G, F);

1. An investigation report (in the E language of a witness), an investigation report (in the G Currency of a witness), an investigation report (in the hearing of the E statement and reporting on H and I currency impossibility);

1. Application of the statutes of one copy of a record of telephone investigation or recording by a witness E;

1. Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, the selection of penalties, and the selection of fines under subparagraph 5 of Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The instant telecomion is operated by means of an unmanned telecom with which juveniles can immediately enter the guest room, and the Defendant was unaware of whether the instant telecomionion was made.

2. Where any circumstance exists to suspect that a juvenile is a juvenile in the outer appearance, habiting, shots, etc. of those who intend to be subject to sexual intercourse, a person engaged in the judgement-making business shall confirm whether the juvenile is a juvenile by identification card or any other reliable method, and allow the sexual intercourse only where it is confirmed that a juvenile is not a

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Do4282, Oct. 8, 2002). In light of the following circumstances, this Court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence: