A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:30 on June 30, 2014, the Defendant was able to take care of the police officer who called the said police box before the police box, on the ground that the police officer, who received a telephone before the police box, was frightened to the said box, and the police officer, who was faced with a disturbance, was able to take care of the Defendant’s breath and hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers at night time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant committed the instant crime again even though he/she had a majority of the past violence districts of the same kind and kind.

However, the defendant is divided while making a confession, and the execution shall be postponed only once in consideration of the educational degree of the defendant, his family relationship, and economic conditions.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.