Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 J. 53] On October 22, 2015, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol within the “D liquor” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on February 22, 2015, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face by drinking the victim E ( South, 21 years old, and 21 years old) who had drinking alcohol on other tables.

[2017 고 정 900] 피고인은 2015. 02. 22. 04:25 경 수원시 팔달구 F에 있는 G 파출소에서 위 폭행 사건으로 현행범 체포된 상태에서 피고 인의 일행을 경찰관이 퇴거시키자 불만을 품고 술에 취한 채로 소란을 피우고 난동을 피워 경장 H가 제지를 하자 “ 이 새 꺄 원한다면 이건 어떻냐

A government office made an act of disturbance in state cancellation, such as flick and flicking, flicking, etc.

[2017 High 1013] From March 14, 2015 to March 11:00 on March 14, 2015, the Defendant destroyed another’s property by an influence with TV equivalent to 500,000 won owned by the Victim K within the limit of 616 Jurur 616, under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 53]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Report of investigation (in case of cotton No. 11 of investigation records);

1. A photograph of a victim, a photograph of a fluoric image and a photograph of a fluoric image (2017 dried 900);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. He’s statement made by the police [2017 High Court Order 1013];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing TV photographs damaged;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance for revocation of official document), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of disturbance for revocation of property damage), and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;