The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is C auditors under the Korean Farmers Association’ Federation.

From November 14, 2015 to 16:30 on November 14, 2015, the Defendant attended 12,000 farmers, who were the prior assembly of the 12,000 plenary session in front of the former Samsung Samsung-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Tae-gu, Seoul, at the national conference of farmers, followed by the participants of the national conference of farmers and the participants of the public conference of the 14:40 to 16:30.

From 17:41 to 17:56 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the traffic of traffic and the traffic of the transited vehicles, such as: (a) one of the six-lanes on the national highways of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul National Road No. 1 A, 300 meters away from the intersection to the intersection at the entrance of the Gu office, along with the participants of the above assembly demonstration, leaving the reported assembly space to occupy eight-lanes on both directions; and (b) occupying eight-lanes on both directions.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, on November 14, 2015, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) on November 14, 2015, the close point at which the participants in the assembly of the Korean Farmers’s Congress were reported to cross-sections at the entrance of the Gu office where the gate was installed; and (b) the Defendant, who was affiliated with C, was participating in the demonstration at the entrance of the Gu office at the entrance of the Gu office.

However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that there was interference with traffic by the participants in meetings of meetings of national farmers such as the defendant, etc., and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it [the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 Gohap 12,46 (Joint) and 102 (Joint) Decided July 4, 2016, which was submitted by the prosecutor as reference materials by the prosecutor, was 107 side of the judgment, and from 16:51 on the same day on the day when the cost of public transportation-oriented demonstration centering on public transportation by the defendant et al. al. al., 1 was driven in the middle of the entrance of the Gu office from 16:51 to the middle of the day when the cost of public transportation-oriented demonstration centering on public transportation by the defendant et al. was al.