1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: Gap's evidence No. 4 [the plaintiff's previous confession which recognized the identity of Gap's evidence No. 4 in the trial court's opinion, considering the whole purport of the arguments, Gap's evidence No. 201Da5654 delivered on April 24, 2001, and the plaintiff's confession as to the formation of a document No. 4 should be treated equally with the cancellation of a confession, so the confession as to the establishment of a document should not be freely withdrawn even if it is withdrawn later. The plaintiff's assertion that the confession is not true and is recognized as a mistake due to the whole purport of the oral argument is not consistent with the plaintiff's evidence No. 201Da6367 delivered on April 13, 201, which is not consistent with the plaintiff's evidence No. 4 and the plaintiff's evidence No. 14 of this case's evidence No. 1 of this case's assertion that the confession is not identical with the plaintiff's evidence No. 101.

2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s respective claims against the Defendants are without merit.