beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 15, 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B, who was aware of his/her reputation at an infinite location not more than Daegu, stating that “A victim B was engaged in any business, and the mobile phone is required to open a new mobile phone in his/her name and pay it every month.”
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even after opening the cell phone in the name of the victim since he received the decision of individual rehabilitation on May 2016 and around April 2018 after he received the decision of individual rehabilitation.
The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim one cellular phone (A2101-256) of the amount equivalent to KRW 1,864,512, which the victim opened from the E agency on the same day, within the Ulsan-gu Council member of “D Imposition,” which is the workplace of the victim, Ulsan-gu, the same day from the victim.
In addition, from that time to April 24, 2019, the Defendant deceivings the victim by the same method as indicated in attached Table 1, and received money and valuables and goods equivalent to KRW 26,564,512 over five times from the victim.
2. Around February 9, 2019, the Defendant sent the victim F, who was aware of a usual place in Daegu or lower Daegu, to the victim F, the Defendant sent the victim F, who was aware of the fact that “on the part of the victim F, the victim F, who borrowed his/her name on the two cost of the mobile phone to be used in work, will have been used for six months if he/she borrowed his/her name, and if terminated, the amount of the device will be emitted only every month, and the charges and the value of the device will be paid in full.”
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even after opening the cell phone in the name of the victim since he received the decision of individual rehabilitation on May 2016 and around April 2018 after he received the decision of individual rehabilitation.
The defendant deceivings the victim as such.