The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime in addition to fines imposed twice due to the violation of the Resident Registration Act, etc.

However, the nature of the crime of this case is not good, such as hiding the fact that his mother, who is a beneficiary of a survivor's pension, dies for a long period exceeding five years, and receiving the survivor's pension, and the amount obtained by the defendant through the crime of this case exceeds 97 million won, and the recovery of damage was not made at all until the trial was at hand until the trial was held, and in light of all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, background, means, means, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.