[Defendant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 2 others

Defendant

August 14, 2008

Daejeon District Court Decision 2007Da3338 Decided February 14, 2008

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

On February 19, 2002, the defendant, around the other hand, implements the procedure for the transfer registration of ownership of each share on the ground of an agreement for share transfer on February 19, 2002 with respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, and as a preliminary one fifth of the shares of 700 shares on each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, shall execute the procedure for the transfer registration of ownership on December 31, 199 for the completion of the acquisition by prescription on December 31, 199.

2. Purport of appeal

The part concerning the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed.

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

In the first instance court, the Plaintiff sought from the Defendant the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for each share of 70/2160 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet as the primary claim, and sought from the preliminary claim for the implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer for each share of 70/160 of the total share of 70/2160 of each share of each real estate listed in the separate sheet. The first instance court dismissed the primary claim and accepted the preliminary claim.

Since the appeal was lodged only by the defendant, the primary claim without the appeal is not subject to the adjudication of this Court, but subject to the adjudication of this Court.

2. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows: (a) deleted the part concerning the judgment on the primary claim as stated in the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's third 10 to 21; and (b) in Chapter 4, 16 (hereinafter referred to as "number 3 omitted") as "(hereinafter referred to as "number 9 omitted")"; and (c) therefore, it is identical to the entry in the reasoning of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance judgment'

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the part on the conjunctive claim in the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal against it is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment Form Omission of Indication of Real Estate]

Judges Full-time (Presiding Judge)