The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal D and E’s statements are not consistent and cannot be believed, and the written diagnosis of injury is based on D’s statements, so it cannot be believed, and otherwise, there is no evidence to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case where the Defendant abused D and inflicted bodily injury.

Even if the defendant saw D's her block, he saw D's her block.

The causal relationship between the defendant's act and the injury of D should be denied in consideration of the evidence of D.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and there is an error of law by mistake.

2. Determination

A. As to whether the act of assault was recognized or not, D and E statements were made differently from the Defendant’s statement in the court of original instance, while D and D stated the Defendant’s course of assault in the court of original instance, but they consistently stated as to the principal act of the facts charged in this case that the Defendant was able to kill D’s cherb and bomb, and, in the court, E consistently stated that they were able to d’s bherbling and bherb, and that they would know the following circumstances. In light of the fact that, as they were engaged in the same industry as the Defendant, D and those engaged in the same kind of industry as D and they could not have any special circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, E’s statements are credibility.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including the statements of D and E with credibility, the fact that the defendant fighted with her body by using her bridges and dubs, is recognized.

B. According to the written diagnosis of injury as to whether a causal relationship is recognized, the injury and injury and injury and injury and the injury and injury and the injury and injury and the injury and injury were diagnosed as “influoral base and tension,” and “influoral and tension, deprivation of the part on the part of the left-hand side,” and the opinion of 'influoral and dluoral base are existing inverte disease.