beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
Summary of Grounds for Appeal
Although the defendant did not use violence against the victim at all, the court below erred by misunderstanding the fact that the defendant found guilty, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
The punishment (fine 300,000 won) sentenced by the court below on unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.
In full view of the following facts and circumstances recognized by the court below's judgment on the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant's assaulted the victim jointly with F, so the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is just, and the defendant's assertion on this part is not accepted
From the trial court, F, who is the defendant, stated that the part that the victim was able to take the scarf worn by the defendant was recognized, but the fact that the victim was not at the time was not at the time.
According to the result of the verification in the trial court on CCTV images installed in the victim's room, it is confirmed that the defendant and F punished the victim and the victim within the victim. One male life was frighted by the victim, leading the victim to the victim, leading the victim to the victim, leading the victim, leading the victim to the victim, leading the victim back, and entering the victim again, and that the defendant again followed the victim, and it was confirmed that the victim got out of the victim, and that the victim got out of the victim again, and that it was confirmed that the victim got out of the victim again, and that the defendant got out of the victim, and that it is unclear whether the defendant was found that the victim got out of the victim and left the victim. However, as described in the facts charged, it appears that the defendant was frightd or pushed the victim, and that the victim was damaged more than once, this corresponds to the statement on the facts of damage of the victim.
The crime of assault prescribed in Article 260 of the Criminal Act shall be committed by means of tangible force on human body.