logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.14 2018고정560
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 15:00 on October 19, 2017, the Defendant appeared at the court of Seoul Central District Court 408, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 157, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 408, the above court of 2017 and the Defendant C, the above court of 1624, as a witness of the Defendant, and testified after taking an oath. On January 17, 2017, the witness, “A witness, at the time of directors D on January 17, 2017, was damp at the office of

The answer to the question of “N” by the counsel of “N”, and the question of the counsel of “Woon,” “Woon,” “Woon,” and “Woon,” in writing.

The answer to “D” and the answer to “D outside the office?”

The question of “N” is called “N”, and “at that time, the Defendant (C means the Defendant) was able to get into the office, in his hand, to avoid entering the office, and D’s head was tightly about to continue to enter.

The answer to the question of “N” by the counsel, and the fact that “in this process, the Defendant (C’s meaning) was satisfing this d’s fat

“I do not present this question to the defense counsel.”

The answer to the questions of the counsel called “D” and “D is unable to enter the office and going to the second floor office,” and the answer to the question of “D” and “(D) is sure to have entered the office of the Ek Center.”

The answer to the prosecutor's question of "D" testified to the effect that C does not have any entry into the above E office on January 17, 2017, because D had no entry into the above E office, and C has testified to the effect that D had no flicking and flicking in the above office.

However, on January 17, 2017, C assaulted D such as d's flabing away from the office while having a dispute with D's flab in E office in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F1 floor.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (record No. 39 of evidence);

arrow