logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.25 2018고정264
위증
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

On December 7, 2017, around 16:30 of the facts charged, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as the 2017 Highest 2257 Special Bodiison on B, from the court of the Daegu District Court (No. 2017 Highest 2017 High Court).

Defendant’s defense counsel’s “Afford the Defendant’s crypted D in two days on February 25, 2017 and February 27, 2017

The answer to the question “N” and, subsequent to the answer, the “N-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

The question " shall be examined from the beginning to the end."

The defendant answer " at the time when he asks D on February 25, 2017, the defendant was placed in the defendant's hand at the time when he asks D on the defendant's hand.

“In all other words, I have not asked for the question.”

1. The presiding judge's answer, "I do not have a fluent relationship with the police officer of the Korean Bar Association," and 1.0

The answer to the question of “N” and the presiding judge, “I do not know that E had a witness now before the police.”

The questioner asked “I” answer “I have no telephoneed. I have received.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not memory of all the days in C on February 25, 2017, but only those days which were inside the office, so he was not accurately aware of whether B was at the time D using the Otoba safety mother outside the office, and the defendant was asked to receive a witness examination from the police officer of the police station in the Gyeongbukbuk-do, Busan, on March 24, 2017, but refused to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Judgment

1. Whether testimony of a witness in a judicial precedent constitutes a false statement contrary to memory shall be judged by understanding the whole of the testimony in the interrogation process as a whole, not a simple part of the testimony, but a single part of the testimony. If the meaning of testimony is unclear or multi-dimensionally understood, the ordinary meaning and usage of language;

arrow