(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고정2812

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고정2812

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2012, around 23:56, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D(65 years of age) who is a substitute engineer and the borrower are disputing the problem of the substitute driving fee in the Suwon-si Suwon-si 201-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Accordingly, the Defendant committed violence to the victim by pushing ahead of the part of the victim's right side by pushing ahead of it one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each investigation report (general);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of violence against victims;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault the victim D as stated in the judgment. As such, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that he did not assault the victim D as stated in the judgment, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, namely, that at the time, the defendant and the victim were faced with humbling and dispute with each other, etc., and the victim made a statement from the defendant as stated in the judgment of the court. The victim made a statement that "the defendant and the victim were pushed down with each other or did not have a humbling" at the time of the police investigation, and the defendant made a statement that "the defendant and the victim did not have a humbling or a humbing with each other" at the time of the police investigation, and later made the statement that "after the judgment of the case, the victim was fuming down on the floor immediately after the judgment of the case, and immediately after the case, the victim went away from the scene and the victim was driving away the defendant, and therefore, the victim's assertion cannot be accepted the above facts.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2013.04.25 2013고정67

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.06 2017노3995

-광주지방법원 2015.10.28 2015노278

-제주지방법원 2014.07.17 2013노565

-광주지방법원 2015.12.08 2015노1806