The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the victim was able to catch, attract, and take the defendant's seat, and the victim did not take the power on his own, and the defendant did not debris the victim's bat.

2. As the judgment of the court below reveals, the court below stated that ① the defendant and the victim, the principal of the E-cafeteria where the defendant and the victim are the victim, stated in the investigative agency that the defendant would not have any 10 minutes of the 10-minute after the victim was abused by the victim, ② the victim was under the influence of alcohol but the defendant stated that the victim was not under the influence of alcohol, ② the defendant was not under the influence of alcohol. However, according to the movement route alleged by the defendant, even though the victim and G did not want to drive the victim, the defendant could not easily find the victim's walk before the Fuser who stated that the defendant and the victim were in the place where the victim met again after going through the above restaurant, ③ G stated in the court of the court of the court below that the defendant and the victim did salbling each other at the Fusbus parking lot, and G was aware that the defendant and the victim knew 7 years and 10 years years, and thus there was no reason to believe that there was any false violence against the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.