logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.26 2016고단234
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) committed an act in violation of the victim D (57 tax) who is a taxi engineer on the road located near the exit area of Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, and tried to open a taxi in the long-term Dong (57) in the direction of Kimpo-si, the Defendant: (a) tried to stop the victim; (b) saw the victim from opening a taxi in the vicinity of the Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul; (c) saw the victim's head at one time; and (d) saw the victim's head at one time on the side; and (e) when the victim stops the said taxi on the side of the road; and (e) when 4:5 times the victim spits the victim, the Defendant spited the victim's right side with drinking on the road; and (e) spited the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged property, on the date and place stated in paragraph 1, removed one of the card terminals owned by the Defendant, which was installed in the above taxi on his hand, and destroyed by putting one of the card terminals in hand at the market price of the Plaintiff, which was located in the above taxi on his hand.

3. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was investigated from the Seoul Mapo Police Station F Office located in 183 as Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and from G, who is a public official belonging to the above F, for the criminal facts under paragraphs 1 and 2, from around 06:30 on December 20, 201, the Defendant “Neman Police”

Bags. Spits, such as spiting of police dogs, flaps, etc., and spits or spits, as they can be taken by drinking, and spits or spits, etc. on the face of the above G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the point of assault by a driver), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the punishment of the crime.

arrow