beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Around 16:30 on September 27, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that the victim C(40 years of age) was “Isle to her governance,” and that the victim was “Isle to her seat and rear part of the victim,” while she was working in the so-called So-gu So-gu, So-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, 630 Haak-gu, So-gu, So-gu, So-called “Isle to her seat,” and that the victim meted “Isle to her governance,” and she got the victim’s face and rear part once every time.
As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury that requires two weeks of treatment, such as back booms, etc.
2. According to the evidence duly adopted by this court, it is recognized that the victim stated at an investigative agency that he/she had suffered from the defendant as stated in its reasoning, and that the victim was issued a medical certificate in the name of doctor D to the effect that approximately two weeks medical treatment is needed.
On the other hand, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record: (i) the victim stated at an investigative agency that knee was in contact with the floor because knee seems to have been in contact with this court; (ii) the victim testified in this court that the head knee part seems to be drinking and drinking; (iii) the witness testified that the defendant was not in contact with the victim's face part twice; (iv) the defendant testified that knee was not in contact with the victim's body part; and (v) the defendant testified that knee was in contact with the victim's face part; (v) in light of the fact that the defendant was in contact with the victim's body part on twice, but the defendant was not in contact with the victim's face part; and (v) The F testified testifiedd the defendant's body part, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, making the defendant in contact with the victim's face part, thereby making the victim kneeing.
In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant suffered from the back strings by using the back strings, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the defendant cannot be punished as an injury crime, and only an assault crime can be established, in light of the record.