Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2012, around 03:40 on May 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate using the key that was ordinarily owned by the Defendant and the hedging victim on the ground that he/she re-examines the intention of objection to the victim; and (b) entered the house and intrudes on the residence of the female.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 11 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of deaf-mutes;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Code of the Detention in the Labor House. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant, in a de facto marital relationship with the victim, resided together with the victim's residence and temporarily resided in a dispute over the extent of marital fighting at the time of the instant case, the defendant has the right to access the victim'

According to the records, the defendant was living together with the victim from around March 2008 to early March 2012, and the defendant continued to possess the key of the victim's residence, which he had been living together with the victim at the time of the instant case without returning it to the victim. However, the following circumstances revealed by each evidence of the judgment, namely, the defendant raised a dispute over the victim's money issue on March 201, and requested the victim to make a decision by decision from the victim, and had been living separately at his own residence in Seoul since that time. The victim avoided contact, such as telephone from the defendant around the instant case. The time when the defendant entered the victim's residence was the new wall time when the victim was diving, and the victim was a complicated situation with the defendant around March 2012.