Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Central District Court on July 31, 2015.

Defendant

A and the victim C report on June 26, 1984 and divorceed on May 3, 2001.

1. On July 19, 2015, the Defendant, at around 23:39 on July 19, 2015, issued a written complaint to the Seoul Western on the ground that the victim did not withdraw the case of the illegal uttering of official document (2015-7385) in which the victim received the written complaint from the Seoul Western on the ground that he/she would not withdraw the case, and would find out the victim's Among the victims, he/she would know his/her birth's confidential information, and to the victim (F) with the Defendant's cell phone (E), "the DNA birth is identified, and the thickness is thickness."

well, transfer to the Gangnam Police Station.

(d) Withdrawal;

1.1 Good horses

Finally, it is possible to set the appearance of the third party.

The withdrawal shall be made even if it is not possible to do so.

place of establishment, place of human origin;

I see that sound is known to the people.

(d) Withdrawal;

"Transmission of cell phone letters containing 'the mobile phone'

Intimidation was made.

2. On July 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 00:19 on July 20, 2015, as to the Defendant’s cell phone (E) for the foregoing reasons, to the victim (F) with the Defendant’s cell phone (E) on the following grounds: “I will first die in gene and I will leave D only before her gene imprisonment with prison labor. I will withdraw the last opportunity.

It transferred to the Gangnam Police Station.

(d) Withdrawal;

G winded a large marm mar and marm mar, and how much mar mar is, if you have become aware of the confidential information of birth during the juvenile season.

"Transmission of cell phone letters containing 'the mobile phone'

Intimidation was made.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Sponse photograph of a telephone threat;

1. Each LG U response data;

1. The photograph of the location of the base station most of the sending pictures by the recipient;

1. Photographs of a NAV map of the place where the person is located;

1. A report on investigation (the mobile phone number used for the crime and a person who made a telephone immediately before the crime is committed;

1. Previous convictions: Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act and Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts; and