1. The Defendants’ delivery of real estate stated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff to each Plaintiff at the same time, and at the same time, 140,000.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 27, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a real estate lease agreement with Defendant C, the agent of Defendant B, with the actual owner of the building indicated in paragraph (1) of the order (hereinafter “instant building”), with the terms that the Plaintiff wishes to lease the instant building, which is Defendant B, with the term of KRW 140,000,000, and the term of two years, and the said lease deposit was to be paid to the said Defendant C.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff paid to Defendant C the full amount of KRW 140,000,000 as the above lease deposit, and received delivery of the instant building from the Defendants on December 13, 2011.

C. A duplicate of the complaint of this case, on December 9, 2014, stating that the Plaintiff terminated the said real estate lease agreement on the grounds of the expiration of the above lease term, was served by public notice on Defendant B.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B: Decision by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act): Defendant C: Decision of deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the said real estate lease agreement was terminated on December 9, 2014.

Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to pay KRW 140,000,000 to each Plaintiff simultaneously with the delivery of the instant building from the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.