The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.

A sum of KRW 100,00 shall be collected from the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant thought that L was arrested due to misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (related to the attempted use of a phionon around October 25, 2018) D’s information that D had been believed to have been arrested. While D could administer phiphones by means of injection to his blood line, it is doubtful that D could have been able to administer phiphones by means of injection to his own blood line, it would be true that D would have concealed the Defendant’s intent to inform the Defendant of the drug crime and attempted to inform the Defendant at the first time, he refused to request for the first time while he was imprisoned and imprisoned with a part of the brons other than the blood line, and the Defendant did not have any intention to use phiphones, so the use of phiphones or attempted to use phis cannot be established.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the intention.

B. Even if the facts charged in the instant case are found guilty, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 또는 법리오해 주장에 대하여 1) 피고인은 원심에서도 이 부분 항소이유와 같은 취지의 주장을 하였고, 원심은 그 판시와 같은 이유로 피고인의 주장을 배척하였다. 2) 살피건대, 피고인이 당초 경찰에서 ‘일부러 삑사리를 냈다’는 취지로 진술한바 있고 당심 증인 D 역시 이 법정에서 ‘피고인이 일부러 잘못 주사한 것으로 보인다’는 취지로 진술하였으며, L의 체포 시기와 경위 및 D이 피고인의 마약범죄에 관하여 진술한 시기와 경위 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인의 주장과 같이 D을 의심한 나머지 D의 부탁대로 필로폰을 투약해 줄 것인지를 망설인 듯한 정황이 없지는 아니하나, 피고인은 결국 D의 부탁에 따라 필로폰이 든 주사기를...