logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.11.13 2015노4216
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

A. As to the above defendant A (1)-A-2 of the judgment of the court below against the above defendant, the above defendant tried to l to l to l with a philopon, which is the case B's h to have a philopon. B) of the above judgment of the court below.

(4) and (7) of this Act, the above defendant did not give L with a philopon to L, but taken L by himself.

C) Of the above judgment of the court below, with regard to paragraph (5) A-(5) of the above judgment, only administered Lambononon at the above date, and the above defendant did not have any fact of administering Lbonon. D)

As to paragraphs (6) and (8) of this Article, the above defendant purchased 5 g of opphones jointly with L, and the above defendant alone purchased 10 g of opphones, and does not sell 4 g of them to L.

(2) The lower court’s imprisonment (two years of imprisonment, additional collection 3,725,00 won) against the above Defendant is too unreasonable.

B. As to the above defendant B (1) and (1) of the judgment of the court below against the above defendant, the defendant A told L to administer a philopon, and the above defendant did not administer a philopon to L (B).

for subsection (5) of this section, the defendant only told L to administer a philophone, and the above defendant did not administer a philophone to L.

(2) The lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 725,00) against the above accused is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) In addition to the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below as to the determination of misunderstanding of facts against Defendant A, in particular, L’s investigation agency and court room, and the fact that the above Defendant led to the confession of the above facts charged in the investigation agency and court of original instance, the above Defendant was able to see the injection of the injection, which caused L’s philopon, and took a philopon to L, and 10 g of the philopon, and purchased 10 g of the philopon.

arrow