logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.01.08 2015고합138
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years and for five years, respectively.

Defendant

A No. 2 of the evidence seized by A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On February 6, 2014, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and two months at the Busan District Court on February 6, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 5, 2015 at the Busan Detention Center.

[Criminal facts] 2015 Gohap 138

1. While Defendant B was not allowed to handle a local mental drug under Article 2 subparag. 3 (a) of the Narcotics Control Act, the Defendant sold approximately 9.13g of a synthetic marijuana containing the ingredients of AB-S or car (AB-CHACA) to the State on September 2015, 2015, after the F department store located in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, Busan, the Defendant sold approximately 1.5 million won from A and as a local mental drug.

2. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (Psychotropic 1) The above Defendant is not a handler of narcotics.

On June 2015, the Defendant: (a) 80,000 won was 80,000 won and 2g of mert clocks (hereinafter “clocks”; hereinafter referred to as “clockscopon”) to the Defendant, who was placed in the front of a kindergarten located in H located in Busan Metropolitan Government G on the road of a kindergarten located in the front of the entrance.

2) On September 15, 2015, the above Defendant: (a) placed in a disposable injection machine a amount of approximately 0.05g philopon, which he/she purchased in the front of K located in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan CityJ, and administered once in the way of injecting into the arms after he/she was dilutiond.

3) On September 17, 2015, the above Defendant asserted that: (a) 1.5 million won was granted to B from the latter part of the F department store located in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan, and that Defendant A was aware of not only the synthetic marijuana designated as temporary narcotics but also the marijuana normally; and (b) thus, the crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (mariju) is established. However, such circumstance does not interfere with the establishment of a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) due to the purchase of synthetic marijuana, smoking, and possession, as it falls under the mere site of a law.

approximately 9.13 grams.

arrow