(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.11.10 2017노504 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.11.10 2017노504

상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, by misapprehending the legal principles or mistake of facts, did not inflict an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged.

At the time of the instant case, the Defendant, while engaging in a dispute with the victim at the time of the instant case, was apprehended to interfere with women within the crym of the crym of the crym of the crym of the crym of the crym of the c

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. It erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The summary of the facts charged in this case, which the court below found guilty, is as follows.

On January 13, 2016, at around 20:10, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim, such as the wheels of the victim, who was disputing the victim E (n, the age of 51) and was in dispute with the victim, and was pushed the victim by her hand, and (b) was in need of treatment for about 14 days on both sides, which are in need of treatment in order to prevent the victim from reporting any defect to the police.

3. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination on the assertion of misunderstanding the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine is consistent with the following: (a) the victim’s statement is acknowledged credibility in light of the following: (a) the victim’s statement is consistently made by the police to the point that the victimized person suffered an injury by assault from the Defendant from the police to the court; (b) the content of the statement conforms to the victim’s photograph and injury diagnosis; (c) the degree of attitude in this court was serious; and (d) it is difficult to find the reason

In addition, the witness F had no physical contact between the defendant and the victim at the time of arrival in the escape room on the day of the occurrence of this case.

However, the witness F is the victim of the defendant.

유사 판례

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.04.19 2016고정114

-서울남부지방법원 2016.03.25 2015노115

-수원지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단1370

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.31 2018고단2112

-대전지방법원 2017.09.20 2016노3790