A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around June 2016, the Defendant repeateded with the Victim B and Mannam on the Internet hosting site on November 3, 2019, and finally faced with the Victim’s house when the space is not good, and several police officers were called up. However, on December 21:30, 2019, the Defendant found the house of the Victim of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child of the Child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements concerning B of the defendant's legal statement, the occurrence of a crime to be invaded by a police, and the arrest report (the confirmation of the suspect's records of committing the crime against the victim);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order are as follows: (a) the Defendant has a record of destroying the victim’s property and assaulting the victim several times in the course of repeating the victim’s hedging with the South and North Korea; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime of intrusion upon the victim’s residence again after hedged around November 3, 2019, with the knowledge that the victim does not want access to the Defendant; (c) there are a large number of criminal records against the Defendant; and (d) in particular, at the Daegu District Court of Daegu on March 30, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years of probation and probation due to the violation of the Road Traffic Accident Handling Act; and (d) the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 7, 2018, taking account of the reasons for sentencing that the Defendant again led to the instant crime during the suspended execution period, and that there was no identical criminal records for entering the residence.