The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant asserts that there was an error of law by misunderstanding of facts that, around September 16, 2014, the Defendant had not threatened C, who is a public official in charge of basic livelihood supply and demand at the cultural Dong community service center, around 14:30 on September 16, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning basic livelihood supply and demand by threatening C at the same time and by threatening C, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The Defendant asserts that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant committed a crime of injury, assault, or interference with business on October 3, 2014 in a state of mental disability.

C. The Defendant asserts that the sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장 부분 1) 이 부분 공소사실 피고인은 2014. 9. 16. 14:30경 창원시 마산합포구 D에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 피고인의 상담 요청을 받고 방문한 문화동주민센터 기초생활수급 관련 업무 담당공무원인 위 C에게 “집주인이 10월까지 집을 비우라고 하는데 앞으로 살길이 막막하다. 내를 도와주지 않으면 칼로 찔러 죽어 버릴 것이고, 통장과 돈을 동사무소에 던져버릴 것이다!”라고 말하면서 눈을 부릅뜬 채 노려보며 겁을 주어 C를 협박하였다. 이로써 피고인은 사회복지담당 공무원의 기초생활수급업무에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다. 2) 원심의 판단 원심은 이 부분 공소사실을 유죄로 인정하였다.

3. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, C who is a public official in charge of social welfare at the cultural Dong community service center, visited the Defendant’s residence on September 16, 2014 at the Defendant’s request, and ② the Defendant voluntarily paid to C from the date of the occurrence of the instant case to the Defendant.