logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.01.09 2013고합205
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Performance of official duties;

A. On Oct. 1, 2009, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant under the influence of alcohol to the Cheongcheon-gu Office located in Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, and threatened C, who is a public official in charge of social welfare, with the desire to read “Yak-gu, Chewing, Haak-gu, Haak-gu, Haak-gu.” on Oct. 1, 2009, on the ground that he was excluded from self-support.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the above C to interfere with the performance of duties related to social welfare.

B. Around February 18, 2010, the Defendant found the Defendant under the influence of alcohol in the above Cheongcheon-gu Office where the said C, etc. was in office at around 16:00 on February 18, 2010. For the foregoing reason, the Defendant spawddd the Defendant with sound that “at once anywhere, the male staff in the name unspawd, spawd, spawd, spawd, spawd, and spawd” and pushed the head.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above C, etc. to interfere with the performance of duties related to social welfare.

2. On March 15, 2010, at the early 15:00, the Defendant was under the influence of Cheongcheon-gu, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongcheon-do, 123-9, and sought answers from the victim D, who is an employee, that he cannot obtain a loan because he did not meet the requirements for qualification from the victim D, and that he could not obtain a loan because he did not meet the requirements for qualification.” However, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by avoiding disturbance by leaving the disturbance for about 10 minutes, from that time to July 15, 2013, and interfered with the victim’s work by force over 23 occasions, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

3. Around July 24, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Duplicative Intimidation, etc.) did not pay an amount of wage calculated on the basis of victim E (year 51) that demanded payment of daily wages from his dry field.

arrow