The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (unfair sentencing) points out that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and is against the depth of the instant crime; the Defendant also took part in the instant crime under the idea that C, an accomplice, would mislead and help the victim to have a claim of KRW 50,000,00,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the Defendant denied the participation in the instant crime, such as ① the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “C’s wife at the time of the initial police investigation, with C’s spouse at the time of the first police investigation, will change the password after saving C with C, and, at the time of the instant crime along with C, the Defendant stated to the effect that C was wrong at the scene of the crime, and that C was seated in the same time as C was bad (154 pages of the evidence record), and ② the Defendant’s participation in the instant crime was revealed through the recording file or CCTV image with the two keys, etc. (50,000 won for the victim).