The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant entered into a building management service contract with B and requested B to observe the site of this case, and only did not damage the entrance locks of the management office or instruct B to intrude into the management office, and there was no intrusion into the management office on the day of this case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The circumstances indicated by the lower court and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court: (i) B, from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, the Defendant entered into a management service contract for his H building with him on June 25, 2013, and instructed him to replace a total of seven keys, such as the management office, and the repairer waiting in advance; and (ii) the Defendant, on the day of the instant case, called the replacement of the entrance locker in the management office, called the key repairer to open door and come into the management office; and (iii) B, from the time of intrusion into the management office, made a concrete statement about the key parts of the situation before and after the intrusion into the management office; and (iii) such statement conforms to the statement made by the Defendant to B; and (iii) the Defendant did not have any interest in the building and/or entrusted with the management office with the management office of the instant case without reporting it to the management office of the Defendant’s entrance without reporting it to the management office of the instant case.