logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.11.14 2017고단624
도주등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, the period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A’s escape was arrested on September 18, 201 by arrest warrant in the case of violation of the Labor Standards Act at the E-dong branch office in the Ministry of Labor’s office located in Ansan-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, 400, by the labor supervisor F.

The defendant, who was arrested and investigated at the above office around 16:43 on the same day, called "to make a telephone to children", and went out of the corridor, and then escaped out of the building site of the branch office in the Ministry of Labor.

Accordingly, the defendant escaped even though he was arrested by law.

2. On September 18, 2017, at around 17:00 on September 18, 2017, Defendant A, who damaged public goods of the Defendants, met Defendant B, who was located in the vicinity of the G apartment, before the H amusement room located in the G apartment, and Defendant B, who was seated in the top of the benz car driven by the Defendant B, demanded B to have well fastened the lock that he was seated on his hand, and followed B’s response.

Accordingly, the Defendants, at the time of the above day, arrived at the 27-16 Yadong-si's Yadong-si's Yadong-si's Yadong-si's Yadong-si's Yadong-si's parking lot, and inflicted a cutting machine on the Poter's cargo tool that Defendant B parked, and damaged the

As a result, the Defendants conspired to damage goods used by public offices.

3. The criminal of Defendant B also committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment on the ground that, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 2, A knew that he/she had been investigated by the branch office of the Dong branch office with employment in the Ministry of Labor and had been aware that he/she escaped with his/her hand, but he/she was aware of his/her escape with his/her hand, such as paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report (as to the background of arresting the suspect A)

1. A copy of arrest warrant and an escape manual;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Defendant A who choose a sentence regarding criminal facts: Article 145(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of escape).

arrow