logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나109337
위자료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B, C, and D are co-operators of Gsan F in ASEAN, and Defendant E is an operator of Isan F in ASEAN.

After pregnancy, J, the spouse of the plaintiff, received her father and her mother from her father and her clinic after pregnancy, and only her part was stuffed on February 8, 2014, and the Gsan father and her doctor to be in charge of Defendant B from her father and her clinic.

B. On February 8, 2014, the J sent the fetus’s hair in the process of giving birth to a newborn baby only by nature, but there was a dogculic acid requiring a shoulder, and a multiple fetus was born after a part of the fetus.

After the delivery of the part of the body, J continued to receive a self-satisfying operation after being transferred to the K University Hospital, even after the implementation of the body satisfying part of the body satfy.

J’s newborn baby was suffering from the thring of the brupt aggregate in the course of the above brupting, and thereafter was hospitalized in the brusium for newborn babies in the L University Hospital.

C. On June 2014, the Plaintiff filed one person’s demonstration before the Defendants’ Operating Hospital. In this regard, the Defendants filed a complaint with the Defendants on the following grounds: “The Plaintiff was found to have been in front and rear of his body, and the Defendants’ failure to perform their duties by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out the following details before and after the Defendants’ Operating Hospital.”

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant complaint”). A copy of the diagnosis and treatment with the Isan father that the head of the fetus is small and the shoulder of the fetus is relatively broad shall be reported, but we were born in an emergency situation where the fetus suffers from the pelvis and the body of the fetus is missing, and the fetus is in an emergency to become a masse (hereinafter referred to as “the first accusation”).

2) (In the first instance, the Defendant filed a complaint in the second instance on the following grounds: (a) the fetus did not have to have a degree of five minutes for self-sufficiency (hereinafter “the instant complaint”).

(A) The time is sent by the preparation of a statement of multiple-minutes (hereinafter referred to as “the instant case”).

arrow