logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.21 2018고정1107
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person in charge of overall management and supervision at the construction site of the above officetels and multi-family housing with the site of the D Co., Ltd. in charge of construction of the 14th floor officetels and multi-family housing in the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a manager of the tree of the above construction site and a person in charge of external strawing (pit pumps), concrete typing, on-siteing, cleaning, etc.

On March 7, 2018, Defendants and E, the articles of other workshops, were engaged in the removal of a 14th floor at the above construction site on March 7, 2018.

Since the above construction site is adjacent to the road and the surrounding pedestrians pass along, the Defendants had a duty of care to remove cement sponsed with the prospect of a fresh in the process of removing a fresh, and there was a duty of care to remove cement sponsed with the prospect of a fresh in the process of removing a fresh, so that they do not shock the fresh.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected this and did not instruct and confirm in advance the removal of cement fixers attached to the prospect of the fry house prior to the removal of the fry house before the removal of the fry house. Defendant B operated cement fry with the size of the refryed cement fryed with the prospect of the fry house before the removal of the fry house and caused the fry removal of the fry house due to occupational negligence, which did not remove cement frys in advance before the removal of the fry house.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to cause the victim to suffer two cases of treatment days due to negligence in the above business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. The Defendants: Articles 268 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow