Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 8,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A In general, at the construction site for structures installed on the slope surface in order to protect the estuary, coast, and embankment in the Jinhae-si, in order to prevent the erosion of flowing water, A is in the shape of a box for concrete products near the spatch, which is produced on land, made a certain inside a certain part of the inside and flooded by creating an open space on the sea, and made a sort of concrete pole made on the sea with an open space as stone, a structure used on the foundation of breakwater (in this case, it is produced to be used as the basis of the inside, the basic construction, the top four parts, and the upper four parts) and Defendant B is the field manager and the safety and health manager of E corporation, and Defendant B is the safety manager at the construction site.

Four victims F, etc. are members of the above Kson production work.

A victim F(45), G(57), H(41), I(43), and J(5:00 on March 28, 2013, the victim F(45 years old), H(41 years old), H(43 years old), and J(51 year old) had completed the construction of the above construction site, and had a structure temporarily installed to make the wall-to-p concrete structure in a prescribed form and a water control level (in the case of this proposal, a wall fry to put an empty space inside the Kson) by spreading the wall so as to make it possible to make it possible to construct the wall-to-p concrete structure in a fixed form and a water control level (in the case of this proposal, the wall fry was built to put an empty space inside the Kson) and then removed the window cryp of windows above the wall

In such a case, the Defendants had a duty of care to take measures to prevent risks, such as fixing the fluor under the fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor, supporting the fluorial fluor by combining the fluorial fluor with the steel, and combining the safety level to the workers in the steel.

Nevertheless, the Defendants neglected this and caused the victims to work without taking measures to prevent the above danger, and the victims were working 3.5m.