The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who raises a dog in the “C” located in Gyeongsan-si.

When the defendant raises a dog, the defendant raised a dog without putting the neck connected to the neck, even though he had a duty of care to prevent any harm to others by cutting the neck or cutting the fence.

As a result of the Defendant’s negligence, around 12:20 on January 26, 2019, at around 12:20, the Defendant got out of the factory, leaving the hacker connected to the hacker B, and getting out of the factory, and getting out of the factory the hacker hacker hacker hacks up to the victim D. In addition, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, “the first hacker off, closed, the hacker’s hacke’s hacks and kne’s hacks of the hacker, the knee’s hacks and kne’s hacks of a single hacke, other than the h

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

According to the statement of the written application for no punishment submitted on March 4, 2019 in this Court, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intention that he/she does not want to be punished for the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.