logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고합205
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 24,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Along with the lack of ability to discern things or make decisions due to a bipolar disorder, the defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") committed a theft by finding out the Fone Star motor vehicle owned by the victim parked in the victim E with the display of the vehicle chain on July 3, 2014, and driving the said vehicle using the gap in surveillance of the victim.

[Facts of Demanding Medical Treatment and Custody] As such, when the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a stimulative disorder, the Defendant has committed a crime corresponding to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, and requires medical treatment in the Medical Treatment and Custody Facility and is in danger of recidivism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police station and each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A E-document;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on occurrence of a crime and a report on each investigation;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and investigation reports (Attachment to repeated records);

1. The need for treatment and the risk of recidivism: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by the witness H and I’s testimony, the statement of a mental appraisal statement, and the evidence revealed earlier; (b) the above mental appraisal statement are as follows; (c) the defendant has a mental disorder; (d) the defendant has a mental disorder at the time of the crime of this case; (e) the defendant has a mental disorder; (e) there is a high possibility of having been a mental disorder at the time of the crime of this case; and (e) the fact that the actual verification was in a state of mental disorder that has been damaged by the damage network and the network; and (e) the fact that it is deemed necessary to stabilize the mental state through medical treatment and custody in order to prevent recidivism in the future; and (b) even if the defendant’s statement is based on the defendant’s statement, the defendant

arrow