1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Alimlime (hereinafter “Plaintiff Plime”) is an organization composed of the O’s third and third son P’s 16-year-old Q Q Q’s 21-year-year-old99, whose descendants are 20 years of age or older.

Plaintiff

B, C and Defendant D, E, F, G, H, K, and L are members of the Plaintiff sub-council.

B. On November 10, 1917, in the forestry register concerning M 7,140 square meters of forest land (7,140 square meters; hereinafter “instant forest”), on the racing-si, S, the grandchildren of R, is indicated as being subject to assessment of the instant forest land.

In addition, on December 16, 1970, T, the grandchildren of S, completed registration of preservation of ownership of the forest of this case in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Ownership (Law No. 2111, effective).

C. At present, a grave, such as R, R U, R’s wife V, S, T, T, etc. is installed in the forest of this case.

On January 5, 1948, Defendant D completed the registration of transfer of ownership of a company due to land substitution on March 3, 1948 with respect to 1,57 square meters (hereinafter “the instant answer”).

The answer of this case is the land substituted by the land of 1,669 square meters in the 1,669 square meters in Sejong-si on September 17, 1979 (hereinafter “Wed land”) according to the farmland improvement.

E. At the time, T was killed on June 19, 1972, and at the time, there was Defendant F (AC) who was the heir of the wife X and children, Defendant G (AC) (AC) and Defendant D (AC’s heir), Defendant H (AC), I (AC), and Defendant E (A).

Among them, X died on December 20, 1980, and at the time there was Defendant F, G, D, H (Marriage on August 22, 1974), I, and Defendant E.

And as I died on March 16, 2017, Defendant J, Defendant K, and L, the wife, succeeded to I’s shares in inheritance.

After all, the defendants inherited T as shown in the attached Table.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 21, 29, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including additional numbers), each fact inquiry results for the racing of this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings.