logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.16 2014가합593446
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant A, as to KRW 40,598,268 and its amount, 5% per annum from December 30, 201 to May 30, 2015, and Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendants, upon entering into an agreement with the Plaintiff on December 2006, received the Korean Home shopping company around December 2006, and changed its channel name into a lot shopping around 2007.

The Plaintiff sold the Plaintiff’s insurance products while working as an insurance counselor. In the event that an insurance contract was concluded by the Defendants, the Plaintiff paid fees to the Plaintiff for the performance of the insurance contract to the Plaintiff.

B. (1) Defendant A worked as an insurance counselor for an insurance agency of the agricultural, fishery, and shopping home shopping, from February 201 to November 201. (2) Defendant A entered into an insurance policy with the Plaintiff under the name of the policyholder F on May 31, 2011.

However, the defendant A paid 98,50 won a premium on one occasion after purchasing an insurance policy in the name of F, and, thereafter, the defendant A accused the plaintiff as if the F would maintain the above insurance contract without any intention or ability to maintain the insurance contract.

3) As above, Defendant A, as well as the receipt of KRW 295,650 from the Plaintiff’s insurance agency as an allowance under an insurance contract via an insurance agency, had the Plaintiff obtained KRW 40,598,268 in total as an allowance under an insurance contract by the same method over 100 times from around that time to November 29, 201, as shown in the attached crime inundation (1) in the same manner as indicated in the attached list of crimes (1). C. Defendant B served as an insurance counselor of the said agency from March 201 to November 201.

2 around April 30, 2011, Defendant B entered into the 'Tex 100 Health Insurance Contract' with the Plaintiff in the name of policyholder G.

However, the defendant B paid 56,080 won a premium on one occasion after purchasing an insurance policy under the name of G and thereafter paid it to the following.

arrow