beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 2, 2013, the Defendant made a false complaint against D using a Dward Protocol through a certified judicial scrivener with no name, with the aim to have D punished criminal punishment.
A written complaint is that "D has not engaged in the business with the complainant and used the money while engaging in the business with E, and around October 5, 2009, from G operated by the complainant in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, by deceiving D's wife, as if it had made an investment in G, and had it produced its signature as if it had made an investment in G, and then deceiving the complainant to have made an investment, and then its signature was signed by the complainant on February 15, 2009, and then paid 2,00,000,000 won as of February 15, 2009 to the complainant."
“Around October 8, 2009,” written the phrase and revised a private document, and then around October 8, 2009, if the complainant did not provide money to the complainants based on the said investment agreement, the complainant threatened the complainants not to seize the proceeds of the goods to prevent the transaction with the Public Procurement Service, and proceeds KRW 59,000,000 over 11 times.
However, at the time, the defendant had invested 60 million won in the form of payment in lieu of D in the form of the transaction partner's price for the goods to be paid by G operated by the defendant in the partnership with D, and made a normal agreement to pay 2 million won per month for the said investment.
Nevertheless, on January 3, 2014, the Defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who cannot know his name in the Daegu Do Police Agency civil petition office located in 227, Daegu Yong-gu, Taesung-gu, 2014, and rejected D.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each protocol of examination of suspect with respect to D by the prosecution (including part concerning examination of witness to E and H);
1. E.