logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.12 2014가단90269
노무비
Text

1. Defendant Jeong-man Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 6,863,320 on the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from November 25, 2014 to June 12, 2015.

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be admitted by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 2 to 11 (including the number of branches).

On March 11, 2013, the Defendant Rehabilitation and Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Symna Construction”) subcontracted the construction of Section 2 Section 3 to Defendant Symna Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Symna Co., Ltd”) among apartment construction works, the construction of the apartment by Symna-dong, Nam-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant construction”).

B. On June 4, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract to receive labor costs of KRW 28,00,000 for the transport cost of Defendant Jeong Jong-man and the brick per unit, and KRW 70,000,000 for each floor (hereinafter “instant contract”) and to carry out brick transport and unpaid work at the construction site of the instant case (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. The Plaintiff was engaged in the instant work from the time of the instant contract to December 2, 2013, and was fully paid KRW 35,611,330, total labor cost incurred during the instant work period from Defendant Jeong-man until January 6, 2014.

After that, the instant construction was temporarily interrupted from the end of December 2013 due to the progress of the rehabilitation procedure for Defendant Tranchis construction, etc., and was resumed around February 2014, and the Plaintiff again performed the instant work from the end of February 2014 to the end of April 2014 (hereinafter “instant First Work Period”).

E. However, Defendant U.N. did not pay work costs incurred from the resumption of the instant construction until April 2014, and accordingly, the instant construction was resumed.

F. Accordingly, from May 2014, Defendant Tran Construction, to directly perform the remaining parts of the instant construction works from around 2014, and to directly perform the said subcontract with Defendant Thoman.

arrow