logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.24 2013가합1026
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the receiver F of the rehabilitation debtor joint-use construction company, which is the lawsuit taking over by the defendant joint-use construction company

Reasons

Before the fact of recognition of the occurrence of liability for damages, Defendant Tran Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant construction”) commenced rehabilitation procedures on January 9, 2014 with the Seoul Central District Court 2013 Mahap291, and the administrator took over the litigation procedures. The following is that Defendant Tran Construction Co., Ltd. prior to the filing of the instant lawsuit and the administrator of Defendant Tran Construction Co., Ltd. after the filing of the lawsuit, the administrator took over the litigation procedures: (a) Defendant Tran Construction Co., Ltd.; and (b) Defendant Tran Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Tran Construction”) is the construction works of the exchange equipment (hereinafter “instant construction”); and (c) the construction works of the Seo-gu Incheon Incheon Metropolitan City LM M/M of the instant construction works (hereinafter “instant construction”); and (d) the installation of dump dump 27 meters deep from the underground surface in order to carry out the tunnels, soil, stones, etc.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant vertical area”). On March 13, 2012, Plaintiff C driven Nbeer and Car Quantities around 02:48, and operated the 3rd line road of Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, from the inspection team distance to the Ma-dong, E-dong, Middle School, and then entered the construction site of this case at the center of the road and fell into the vertical exit of this case.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The instant accident caused the injury of Plaintiff C, a driver of the instant accident, to the extent that Plaintiff C, a driver of the instant accident, suffered injury, such as horse, psychotropical damage, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

Plaintiff

B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D and E are the father and mother of Plaintiff C.

[Grounds] In full view of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 9, defendant joint construction, H, I, J, and K Gap evidence 9-1 through 14 in the event of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole arguments, defendant joint construction is conducted as a contractor of the instant construction, defendant H is an employee of defendant joint construction at the construction site of this case, who performs duties such as inspection of safety and health management and safety facilities of workers, and defendant I is a joint construction.

arrow